上海基诺彩票中奖号码

English [en]   fran?ais [fr]  

GNU Ethical Repository Criteria Evaluations

We maintain this evaluation report presenting the compliance level of repository services with the GNU ethical repository criteria. There are some criteria that we can't possibly verify, in which case we accept the site maintainer's word on the matter. This evaluation is done by volunteers coordinated by the Free Software Foundation, and you are welcome to contribute.

Site Grade Date Criteria Version
GNU Savannah A 2015-10-01 1.1
GitLab C 2015-11-05 1.1
GitHub F 2016-04-13 1.1
SourceForge F 2015-10-07 1.1

GNU Savannah — A

Savannah has already achieved the highest grade for ethical hosting; these are the issues that would need to be addressed for it to earn extra credit. If you would like to volunteer to help make some of these changes, please join the Savannah team.

GitLab — C

Things that prevent GitLab from moving up to the next grade, B:

GitHub — F

Things that prevent GitHub from moving up to the next grade, C:

The worst thing that GitHub does is to encourage bad licensing practice: failure to include a license, failure to state the license on each source file, and failure to specify “version 3 or later” when using the GNU GPL. (B2)

Here are additional reasons to avoid GitHub.

SourceForge — F

Things that prevent SourceForge from moving up to the next grade, C:

TOP

 [FSF logo] “The Free Software Foundation (FSF) is a nonprofit with a worldwide mission to promote computer user freedom. We defend the rights of all software users.”

JOIN SHOP

上海基诺彩票中奖号码 西红柿计划软件论坛 赌场龙虎可以作弊吗 贯通乐翻二人麻将 黑龙江时时开奖号 超级大乐透走势图新浪爱彩 3肖6码免费大公开 即时比分007 云南时时官方 超级大乐透官方软件 360时时彩走势图 高手实战稳赚技巧 pt老虎机平台大全 云南快乐时时2019123 香港慈善网三肖 重庆时时两期精准计划 大乐透中奖说明和玩法