上海基诺彩票中奖号码

[en] English   [de] Deutsch   [fr] fran?ais   [ru] русский  

Comments on Roderick Long's Article

by Richard Stallman

Roderick Long's article can be found at this address.

The ideas of the free software movement are compatible with social-democratic (US liberal) views and with laissez-faire (US libertarian) views.

Free software is a matter of freedom. From our point of view, precisely which legal mechanism* is used to deny software users their freedom is just an implementation detail. Whether it is done with copyright, with contracts, or in some other way, it is wrong to deny the public the freedoms necessary to form a community and cooperate. This is why it is inaccurate to understand the Free Software Movement as specifically a matter of opposition to copyright on software. It is both more and less than that.

However, you will often hear people of right-wing ideological persuasion argue in vague way that some general moral principle of property rights compels us to cede our freedom to a system of copyright, regardless of how this affects our way of life. The right-wing Libertarian counterargument, coming as it does from a group that regards property rights as the highest moral principle, is useful as a refutation. It shows that even if you adore property rights for physical objects, you are not compelled to accept copyright.

* = Or technical mechanism, such as withholding the source code, or tivoization.

TOP

 [FSF logo] “The Free Software Foundation (FSF) is a nonprofit with a worldwide mission to promote computer user freedom. We defend the rights of all software users.”

JOIN SHOP

上海基诺彩票中奖号码 宁夏体育彩票11选5 今天快乐双彩开奖 沦陷在日本sm俱乐部续 22选5开奖结果今 威廉希尔即时赔率足球升降分析 大赢家比分-足球比分,即时比分,及时比分 福建36选7 腾讯贵州麻将v1.0.0 东北美女麻将群 黑龙江22选5 卡五星在哪玩 成都麻将视频教程 体彩20选5 有免费好友房的麻将吗 推荐足彩比分专家 一本道成人电影qvod